- Abortion Doctor Found Guilty On 3 Counts Of First-Degree MurderPosted 10 days ago
- Jodi Arias Found Guilty Of First-Degree MurderPosted 15 days ago
- Maryland Governor Signs Death Penalty RepealPosted 21 days ago
Apple Fights California Credit Card Law
Why is this important to me?
Apple is challenging a California law that restricts the amount of personal information that merchants can gather when verifying a credit-card purchase. Other retailers like Wal-Mart and eBay Inc. are supporting Apple saying the law does not apply to online retailers, which have a very different process and more difficulty in verifying the legitimacy of a credit-card purchase. However, consumer advocates say the law should apply to ALL transactions and that the court fight is more about accessing information for marketing and targeted advertising.
Apple Inc. has spent a lot of time in courtrooms fighting intellectual property claims, in federal courts and foreign courts around the world, but now some lawyers are in front of the California Supreme Court this week to discuss the merits of a 20-year-old law that balances credit-card information for purchases and giving out personal information to prevent fraud, reports Insider Monkey.
The Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1991 is a state statute that restricts the amount of personal information that stores can gather when verifying a credit-card purchase Apple Inc. is arguing that the law applies only to physical retailers, where credit-card purchases can be easily verified with looking at the credit card and a photo ID. However, online retailers like the Apple Inc. App Store or iTunes – or the Amazon.com Inc. Marketplace, as well – claim that the law is too restrictive and increases the risk of fraud because these e-retailers need some personal information in order to verify purchases without the ability to inspect cards or IDs. Consumer advocates say that the law should apply to all transactions and that e-retailers don’t need as much information as they claim to prevent fraud – they say it’s more about marketing and targeted advertising in the future, plus privacy concerns.
“This case is an early warning sign about what we’re going to be seeing,” said Pam Dixon of World Privacy Forum. “There is a balance that needs to be found between the prevention of fraud and the over-collection of consumer information.”